Memory of Existing Objects as a Fundamental Idea in the Metaphysics and Ontology of Fictional Entities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14272660

Abstract

Analytic philosophers have long debated about whether fictional characters exist. Fictional antirealists argue that fictional entities are not part of the objects that exist; fictional realists believe that fictional entities do exist. Drawing on recent neuroscientific developments, I make the case here for fictional realism. I review the neuroscientific evidence that memory functions not only to remember the past but to prepare for the future by rearranging the components of past experiences to permit anticipation of future scenarios. Both imagery (neural representations of objects not present in the environment) and imagination (production of novel neural images during waking and sleep) rely on retrieval of memories of previous experiences. I argue that the creation of a fictional character (e.g., Jane Austen creating Emma Woodhouse) involves the recombination of memories and images from the author’s biographical experience. Thus, fictional characters are ontologically dependent not just on the material objects containing their stories (e.g., books, films) but also on the real objects/individuals that the author rearranges to form the fictional entity. My theory explains how this rearrangement of previously existing elements can create something new without relying on the idea of pretence, as all elements of the fictional entity derive from persons or objects existing in the real world.

Keywords:

Memory, Creativity, Imagery, Recall, Materialism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Addis DR, Wong AT, Schacter DL. Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:1363–77.

Agnati LF, Guidolin D, Battistin L, Pagnoni G, Fuxe K. The neurobiology of imagination: Possible role of interaction-dominant dynamics and default mode network. Front Psychol. 2013;4:296.

Allman MJ, Pelphrey KA, Meck WH. Developmental neuroscience of time and number: Implications for autism and other neurodevelopmental disabilities. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012;6:7.

Arzy S, Dafni-Merom A. Imagining and experiencing the self on cognitive maps. In: Abraham A, editor. The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 311–31.

Austen J. Emma. Broadview Press; 1816/2004.

Benoit RG, Schacter DL. Specifying the core network supporting episodic simulation and episodic memory by activation likelihood estimation. Neuropsychologia. 2015;75:450–7.

Boschin EA, Piekema C, Buckley MJ. Essential functions of primate frontopolar cortex in cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E1020–7.

Brock S. The creationist fiction: The case against creationism about fictional characters. Philos Rev. 2010;119:337–64.

Buckner RL. The role of the hippocampus in prediction and imagination. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:27–48.

Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain. 2006;129:564–83.

Cona G, Scarpazza C. Where is the “where” in the brain? A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on spatial cognition. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(6):1867–86.

Davidson PS, Anaki D, Ciaramelli E, Cohn M, Kim AS, Murphy KJ, et al. Does lateral parietal cortex support episodic memory? Evidence from focal lesion patients. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1743–55.

Euston DR, Gruber AJ, McNaughton BL. The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making. Neuron. 2012;76(6):1057-70.

Everett A. The nonexistent. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

Evnine SJ. Making objects and events: A hylomorphic theory of artifacts, actions, and organisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.

Frege G. Sense and reference. Philos Rev. 1948;7:209–30.

Freton M, Lemogne C, Bergouignan L, Delaveau P, Lehéricy S, Fossati P. The eye of the self: Precuneus volume and visual perspective during autobiographical memory retrieval. Brain Struct Funct. 2014;219(3):959–68.

Gaesser B. Constructing memory, imagination, and empathy: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Front Psychol. 2013;3:576.

Hassabis D, Maguire EA. Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(7):299–306.

Ji JL, Heyes SB, MacLeod C, Holmes EA. Emotional mental imagery as simulation of reality: Fear and beyond—A tribute to Peter Lang. Behav Ther. 2016;47(5):702-19.

Kable JW, Kan IP, Wilson A, Thompson-Schill SL, Chatterjee A. Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17(12):1855–70.

Kosslyn SM, Ganis G, Thompson WL. Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(9):635–42.

Kreiman G, Koch C, Fried I. Imagery neurons in the human brain. Nature. 2000;408(6810):357–61.

Kroon F, Voltolini A. Fictional entities. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2018 Edition. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fictional-entities/

Künne W. Perception, fiction, and elliptical speech. In: Jacobi K, Pape H, editors. Thinking and the Structure of the World/Das Denken und die Struktur der Welt. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter; 2011. p. 259–67.

Kvavilashvili L, Rummel J. On the nature of everyday prospection: A review and theoretical integration of research on mind-wandering, future thinking, and prospective memory. Rev Gen Psychol. 2020;24(3):210–37.

Lang PJ. A bio‐informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology. 1979;16(6):495-512.

Lang PJ. Imagery in therapy: An information processing analysis of fear. Behav Ther. 1977;8(5):862–86.

Leech R, Sharp DJ. The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 1):12–32.

Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain. 1983;106(3):623–42.

Maurer AP, Nadel L. The continuity of context: A role for the hippocampus. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021;25(3):187–99.

Meinong A. The theory of objects. In: Chisholm RM, editor. Realism and the background of phenomenology. Glencoe: Free Press; 1960. p. 76–117.

Munton J. Frege, fiction and force. Synthese. 2017;194(9):3669–92.

Nanay B. Multimodal mental imagery. Cortex. 2018;105:125–34.

Russell B. Critical notice of: A. Meinong. Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Mind. 1905;14(56):530–8.

Russell B. On denoting. Mind. 1905;14(56):479–93.

Sabatinelli D, Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Flaisch T. The neural basis of narrative imagery: Emotion and action. Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:93–103.

Satpute AB, Nook EC, Cakar ME. The role of language in the construction of emotion and memory: A predictive coding view. In: Lane RD, editor. Neuroscience of enduring change. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020. p. 56–88.

Schacter DL, Addis DR, Buckner RL. Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data, and applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124(1):39–60.

Schacter DL, Benoit RG, Szpunar KK. Episodic future thinking: Mechanisms and functions. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;17:41–50.

Schacter DL. Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. Am Psychol. 2012;67(8):603–13.

Silson EH, Steel A, Kidder A, Gilmore AW, Baker CI. Distinct subdivisions of human medial parietal cortex support recollection of people and places. Elife. 2019;8:e47391.

Sturm VE, Haase CM, Levenson RW. Emotional dysfunction in psychopathology and neuropathology: Neural and genetic pathways. In: Lehner T, Miller BL, State MW, editors. Genomics, circuits, and pathways in clinical neuropsychiatry. Elsevier Academic Press; 2016. p. 345–64.

Szpunar KK. Episodic future thought: An emerging concept. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010;5(2):142–62.

Thomasson AL. Fiction and metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

Thomasson AL. Fictional characters and literary practices. Br J Aesthet. 2003;43(2):138–57.

Thomasson AL. Speaking of fictional characters. Dialectica. 2003;57(2):205–23.

van Inwagen P, Sullivan M. Metaphysics. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2020 Edition. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/metaphysics/

van Inwagen P. Material beings. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 1990.

Voltolini A. How ficta follow fiction: A syncretistic account of fictional entities. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. doi:10.1007/1-4020-5147-6

Vyshedskiy A. Neuroscience of imagination and implications for human evolution. Curr Neurobiol. 2019;10:89–109.

Waller RR, Brager A, Maj. I did that! Biomarkers of volitional and free agency. In: De Brigard F, Sinnott-Armstrong W, editors. Neuroscience and philosophy. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2022.

Zvyagintsev M, Clemens B, Chechko N, et al. Brain networks underlying mental imagery of auditory and visual information. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37(9):1421–34.

Downloads

Published

04.12.2024

How to Cite

Leyva Pizano, A. (2024). Memory of Existing Objects as a Fundamental Idea in the Metaphysics and Ontology of Fictional Entities. Journal of NeuroPhilosophy, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14272660

Issue

Section

Articles