Acting on What You are Perceiving: The Two-Visual-Systems Hypothesis Revisited

Two-Visual-Systems Hypothesis Revisited

Authors

  • Bin Zhao Institute of Foreign Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Rd., Haidian Dist., Beijing 100871, China https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-9632

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10874499

Abstract

The two-visual-systems hypothesis proposed by Goodale and Milner is a radical one. If it were to be true, then our common sense such as we are acting on what we are perceiving should be completely abandoned. In this paper, I argue that the hypothesis over-generalizes what happens in simple tasks to what happens in complex tasks. By contrast, I demonstrate that what happens in complex tasks is compatible with our common sense. In a word, though what we are acting on may come apart from what we are perceiving in some cases, that is not the whole story.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Bin Zhao, Institute of Foreign Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Rd., Haidian Dist., Beijing 100871, China

Institute of Foreign Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Rd., Haidian Dist., Beijing 100871, China

References

Aglioti S, DeSouza JF & Goodale MA. Size Contrast Illusions Deceive the Eye but Not the Hand. Curr. Biol 1995; 5(6): 679-685.

Andersen RA, Andersen KN, Hwang EJ & Hauschild M. Optic Ataxia: From Balint’s Syndrome to the Parietal Reach Region. Neuron 2014; 81(5): 967-983.

Biegstraaten M, de Grave DD, Brenner E & Smeets JB. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: Not a Change in Perceived Length. Experimental Brain Research 2007; 176: 497-503.

Briscoe R & Schwenkler J. Conscious Vision in Action. Cognitive Science 2015; 39(7): 1435-1467.

Cañal-Bruland R, Voorwald F, Wielaard K & van der Kamp J. Dissociations Between Vision for Perception and Vision for Action Depend on the Relative Availability of Egocentric and Allocentric Information. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2013; 75(6): 1206-1214.

De Wit MM, Van der Kamp J & Masters RS. Distinct Task-Independent Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick Up. Consciousness and Cognition 2012; 21(3): 1410-1418.

Dijkerman HC, Milner AD & Carey DP. Grasping Spatial Relationships: Failure to Demonstrate Allocentric Visual Coding in a Patient with Visual Form Agnosia. Consciousness and Cognition 1998; 7(3): 424-437.

Freud E, Robinson AK & Behrmann M. More than Action: The Dorsal Pathway Contributes to the Perception of 3-D Structure. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2018; 21: 1-12.

Foley RT, Whitwell RL & Goodale MA. The Two-Visual-Systems Hypothesis and the Perspectival Features of Visual Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 2015; 35: 225-233.

Goodale MA & Milner AD. Separate Visual Pathways for Perception and Action. Trends Neurosci 1992; 15(1): 20-25.

Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS & Carey DP. A Neurological Dissociation Between Perceiving Objects and Grasping Them. Nature 1991; 349(6305): 154-156.

Hesse C, Ball K & Schenk T. Visuomotor Performance Based on Peripheral Vision is Impaired in the Visual Form Agnostic Patient DF. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50(1): 90-97.

Jacob P & Jeannerod M. Ways of Seeing, the Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Jeannerod M & Jacob P. Visual Cognition: A New Look at the Two-Visual Systems Model. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43: 301-312.

McIntosh RD & Schenk T. Two Visual Streams for Perception and Action: Current Trends. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47(6): 1391-1396.

Milner AD & Goodale MA. Two Visual Systems Re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008a; 46: 774-785.

Milner AD & Goodale MA. The Two Visual Streams: In the right Ballpark? International Journal of Sport Psychology 2008b; 39: 131-135.

Mishkin M & Ungerleider LG. Contribution of Striate Inputs to the Visuospatial Functions of Parieto-Preoccipital Cortex in Monkeys. Behav Brain Res 1982; 6(1): 57-77.

Pisella L., Binkofski F, Lasek K, Toni I & Rossetti Y. No Double-Dissociation Between Optic Ataxia and Visual Agnosia: Multiple Sub-Streams for Multiple Visuo-Manual Integrations. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 2734-2748.

Schenk T. An Allocentric Rather Than Perceptual Deficit in Patient D.F. Nature Neuroscience, 2006; 9: 1369-1370.

Schenk T & McIntosh RD. Do we have Independent Visual Streams for Perception and Action? Cognitive Neuroscience 2010; 1(1): 52-78.

Schneider GE. Two Visual Systems. Science 1969; 163(3870): 895-902.

van der Kamp J, Rivas F, van Doorn H & Savelsbergh G. Ventral and Dorsal Contribution to Visual Anticipation in Fast Ball Sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology 2008; 39: 100-130.

van Polanen V & Davare M. Interactions Between Dorsal and Ventral Streams for Controlling Skilled Grasp. Neuropsychologia 2015; 79: 186-191.

Whitwell RL, Milner AD & Goodale MA. The two-visual-systems hypothesis: New Challenges and Insights from Visual form Agnosic Patient DF. Frontiers in Neurology 2014; 5: 255.

Downloads

Published

23.03.2024

How to Cite

Zhao, B. (2024). Acting on What You are Perceiving: The Two-Visual-Systems Hypothesis Revisited: Two-Visual-Systems Hypothesis Revisited. Journal of NeuroPhilosophy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10874499

Issue

Section

Opinion and Perspectives

Categories