The Dissolution of Dawkins’ Riddle Is Not So Hard




In this paper, I propose a metaphysics of group selection that solves the conundrum without appealing to the biological research in modern evolutionism but taking it in the background and citing it when needed. In my opinion, the group selection is practically possible and it does not contrast with the other fact, that natural selection involves individuals’ genes only. I propose this metaphysics as a reasoned narration of how the group selection works and I will show how the conundrum can be solved. The point seems to me that differently from what done till now, the description of the evolutionary mechanisms of individuals at the genes level must to correspond to the behaviour of individuals us such at least for what we know about it.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Abbot P. et al., Inclusive Fitness Theory and Eusociality. Nature 2011;471:E1–E2.

Birch J & Okasha S. Kin Selection and Its Critics. BioScience 2015;65(1):22–32.

Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene, New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.

Dawkins R. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, Oxford; San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.

Gardner A & Grafen A. Capturing the Superorganism: A Formal Theory of Group Adaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2009; 22(4):659–671.

Grafen A. The Simplest Formal Argument for Fitness Optimization. Journal of Genetics 2008;87(4):421–433.

Okasha S & Paternotte C. Group Adaptation, Formal Darwinism and Contextual Analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2012;25(6):1127–1139.




How to Cite

Bucci, A. (2023). The Dissolution of Dawkins’ Riddle Is Not So Hard. Journal of NeuroPhilosophy, 2(2).