Theory of Mind, Phenomenology, and the Double Empathy Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7740092Abstract
According to some neurocognitive studies, autistic people do not have a theory of mind (ToM); this means that they are unable to interpret the thoughts, beliefs and intentions of others just by observing their behaviour and/or listening to what they say and how they say it. By contrast, researchers from phenomenology claim that autistic people experience issues in earlier forms of intersubjectivity and that in some cases a ToM may be used to compensate for issues in empathy. My purpose is to present both the ToM account, along with its internal accounts (theory-theory, simulation theory, theory of mind mechanism), and an overview of phenomenology, followed by the presentation of some of the phenomenological counterarguments to ToM. Finally, I argue that both the neurocognitive approach and the phenomenological view seem to assume that issues reside in autistic people only and do not take into account the communication gap between autistic people and non-autistic people. As recent studies claim, autistic people are able to understand other autistic people, while they experience difficulties in communication when involved in intersubjective relations with non-autistic people. This mismatch between the two groups has been labelled the double empathy problem, and I propose that ToM and phenomenology may offer their support to this new perspective.
Keywords:
theory of mind, phenomenology, double empathy problem, intersubjectivity, autismDownloads
Metrics
References
Baron-Cohen S. The empathizing-systemizing theory of autism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009; 1156:68-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.
Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a ‘‘theory of mind’’? Cognition 1985; 21(1):37-46. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.
Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Bullmore ET, Wheelwright S, Ashwin C, Williams SC. The amygdala theory of autism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2000; 24(3):355-364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00011-7.
Bogdashina O. Sensory perceptual issues in autism and Asperger syndrome. Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2016.
Casanova EL, Casanova MF. Defining autism: A guide to brain, biology, and behavior. Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2018.
Crompton CJ, Ropar D, Evans-Williams CV, Flynn EG, Fletcher-Watson S. Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective. Autism 2020; 24(7):1704–1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320919286
Crowell S. Husserlian phenomenology. In: Dreyfus HL, Wrathall MA, eds. A companion to phenomenology and existentialism. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009:9-30.
De Jaegher H. Embodiment and sense-making in autism. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience 2013; 7:15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00015;
Fuchs T. Pathologies of intersubjectivity in autism and schizophrenia. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2015; 22(1-2):191-214.
Gallagher S. Understanding interpersonal problems in autism: Interaction theory as an alternative to theory of mind. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 2004;11(3):199-217.
Gallagher S. Intersubjectivity and psychopathology. In: Fulford K WM, Davies M, Gipps RGT, Graham G, Sadler JZ, Stanghellini G, Thornton T, eds. The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford University Press, 2013: 258-274.
Gallagher S, Zahavi D. The phenomenological mind. Routledge; 2021.
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolati G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996; 119:593-609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593.
Gallese V, Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998; 2(12):493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5.
Goldman AI. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford University Press; 2006.
Gopnik A, Wellman HM. Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind and Language 1992; 7(1-2):145–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00202.x.
Husserl E. Logical investigations. Vol. I. Routledge; 1970.
Husserl E. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999.
Husserl E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.
Husserl E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First book: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Martino Fine Books; 2017.
Leslie AM. Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind." Psychological Review 1987;94(4):412–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412.
Leslie AM. Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition 1994; 50(1-3):211–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90029-9.
Leslie AM, Friedman O, German TP. Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004; 8(12):528–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.001.
Merleau-Ponty M. The philosopher and his shadow. In: McLeary RC trans. Signs. Northwestern University Press, 1964:159-181.
Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge; 2005.
Milton DEM. On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem’. Disability & Society 2012; 27:883–887.
Moran D. Edmund Husserl: Founder of phenomenology. Polity Press; 2005.
Sinclair J. Don’t mourn for us. 1993. Accessed 18 January 2023. http://www.autreat.com/dont_mourn.html
Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications; 2022.
Tanaka S. Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition. Theory, Psychology 2015; 25(4):455–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315583035
Trevarthen C. The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In: Bråten S, ed. Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge University Press, 1998:15-46.
Williams E. Who really needs a ‘theory’ of mind? An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the autobiographical writings of ten high-functioning individuals with an autism spectrum disorder theory. Psychology 2004; 14(5):704–724. doi: 10.1177/0959354304046180
Zahavi D. Beyond empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2001; 8(5–7):151–67.
Zahavi D, Parnas J. Conceptual problems in infantile autism research: Why cognitive science needs phenomenology. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2003; 10(9):53–71.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Elisabetta Angela Rizzo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors continue to hold copyright with no restrictions.
