The Myth of Consciousness: The Reality of Brain-Sign

Authors

  • Philip Clapson Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7253888

Abstract

The physical sciences, as generally understood, are disciplines concerned with the characteristics and behavior of physical objects and states. What is evident about the current condition of consciousness is that: 1) It has no identified physical states; 2) There is no generally accepted vocabulary of its functioning, or its participant entities; and 3) No ‘normal science’ operative structure upon which a community of scientists agree (ref. T. Kuhn). The reasons are that consciousness is a prescientific concept persisting because there is no adequate physicalist theory to replace it, and because biology operates in a way ‘invisible’ to assumed mental processes and vocabulary. What is required is a plausible theory built on a biophysical base. A theory is being developed: it is termed the theory of brain-sign. Brain-sign replaces consciousness as an evolved neural operation in which brains communicate with each other in the collective action of organisms, so addressing the limitations of being an isolated individual. It depends upon neural signification (as brain-sign), in this case of the organisms’ immediate causal orientation towards the world. Thus, multiple organisms are linked as one biophysical operation. Signs are biologically ubiquitous and inherently physical. Organisms are not subjective agents with transcendent (quasi-divine) powers acting in a perceivable world, but evolved organic objects with the ability to cooperate as one overarching biological process. It is anticipated this theoretical operation and vocabulary will explain brain function, which mind fails to do. It accounts for science from both its neural origins and its communal nature.

Keywords:

brain function; brain-sign; collective action; consciousness; interneural communication; science per se

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Barrett LF. How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Pan Books, 2017.

Brown R, Hakwan L, LeDoux J.E. Understanding the Higher-Order Approach to Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science 2019; 23(9):754-768.

Buccino G, Visani E, Sebastiano D, Duran D, Garofalo G, Maggliocco F, Silipo F. The Semantics of Natural Objects and Tools in the Brain: A Combined Behavioral and MEG Study. Brain Science 2022; 12(1): 97.

Buzsáki G. The Brain from Inside Out. Oxford University Press, 2019.

Chalmers DJ. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, 1996.

Churchland PS. Touching a Nerve: Our Brain, Our Selves. W.W. Norton, 2014.

Churchland PS. Conscience: The Origins of Moral Intuition. W.W. Norton, 2019.

Clapson P. From Consciousness to Brain-Sign: A Neurobiological Reconstruction. Activitas Nervosa Superior 2020; 62(2).

Clapson P. Communication Without Consciousness: The Theory of Brain-Sign. Activitas Nervosa Superior 2017; 58: 84–107.

Cobb M. The Idea of the Brain: A History. Profile Books, 2020.

Damasio A. The Feeling of What Happens. Heineman, 1999.

Dehaene S, Lau H, Kouider S. What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Science 2016; 358 6362: 486-492.

Dennett D. Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness. Phoenix, Orion Books, 1996.

Dennett D. From Bacteria to Bach and Back. Allen Lane, 2017.

Descartes R. Discourse on Method and the Meditations. Trans. F.E. Sutcliffe. Penguin, 1968.

Gazzaniga M. Who’s in Charge: Free Will and the Science of the Brain. Robinson, 2012.

Gilman R. Pirandello. Luigi Pirandello. Harold Bloom (Ed.). Chelsea House Publishers, 1989.

Hasson U, Ghazanfar A, Galantucci B, Garrod S, Keysers C. Brain-to-Brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2012; 114-121.

Heidegger M. Being and Time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Basil Blackwell, (1927) 1962.

Hogenboom M. Many animals can give birth without mating. BBC, 2015

http://www.bbc.co.uk/earth/story/20151216-virgin-births-are-happening-everywhere

James W. Principles of Psychology. New York, Holt, 1890.

Jékely G, Godfrey-Smith P, Keijzer F. Reafference and the origin of the self in early nervous system evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 2021.

Kant I. Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. N.K. Smith. The MacMillan Press, (1787) 1933.

Kant I. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Trans. R.B. Louden. Cambridge University Press, (1798) 2006.

Kisiel T. Heidegger’s Way of Thought. Continuum. New York, London, 2002.

Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press, 1962.

Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of neural activity (readiness potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 1983; 106:623–642.

Locke J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Penguin Books, 1997.

May F. Introduction to Luigi Pirandello’s Play: Six Characters in Search of an Author. The Drama Library: Heinemann Educational Books, 1954.

MacGregor N. Living with The Gods. Allen Lane, Penguin Books, 2018.

McGeer V. Autistic Self-Awareness. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology 2004; 11: 235-254.

Mercier H, Sperber D. The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding. Allen Lane, 2017.

Michel M. Consciousness Science Undetermined: A short history of endless debates. Ergo, 2019–2020; 6: 28.

Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 1974; 83: 435-50.

Nietzsche F. The Will to Power. Trans. W. Kaufmann, R.J. Hollingdale, Vintage Books, 1967.

Sample I. Paralysed man uses ‘mindwriting’ brain computer to compose sentences. Guardian, 2021.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/may/12/paralysed-man-mindwriting-brain-computer-compose-sentences

Sartre J-P. Nausea. Penguin Books, (1938) 1965.

Strawson P. One Hundred Years of Consciousness (‘A Long Training in Absurdity’).

https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/one-hundred-years-consciousness-long-training-absurdity, 2017

Triviño V, Nuño de la Rosa N. A causal dispositional account of fitness. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 2016; 38: 6.

Tononi G, Melanie B, Gosseries O, Laureys S. The Neurology of Consciousness: An Overview (2nd Edition). S. Laureys, O. Gosseries, G. Tononi (Eds). Elsevier, 2017.

Valencia A.L, Froese T. What binds us? Inter-brain neural synchronization and its implications for theories of human consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2020.

Watson P. The Age of Nothing: How We Have Sought to Live Since the Death of God. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2014.

Yu C, Smith LB. Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition, 2012; 125(2):244-62.

Published

26.10.2022

How to Cite

Clapson, P. (2022). The Myth of Consciousness: The Reality of Brain-Sign. Journal of NeuroPhilosophy, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7253888