Metaphysical Tunneling: Probabilities of Transient Escape from the Hard Problem

Authors

10.5281/zenodo.15233756

Abstract

The Hard Problem is reframed as a tetrad of mutually inconsistent metaphysical propositions. Incompatibilities among the four propositions are dispatched not through the metaphysician’s customary and futile negation of some particular statement or statements within the tetrad but by introducing flexible quantum-formal links to replace more rigid classical logic connecting the four affirmed assertions. This abstract maneuver, logically reframing the Hard Problem, is made more concrete, pictorially accessible, and empirically testable through a description of subjectivity trapped in a sombrero-shaped potential landscape’s circumferential “gutter.” The metaphysical landscape’s shape, constrained by classical logic, breaks a symmetry hidden by current ignorance of the “Theory of Everything” or TOE, long sought by physicists. The circumferential gutter’s status as a collection of metaphysical vacua, each a discrete individual sensorium, obscures subjectivity’s relationship to the TOE’s physicality. It is argued that changing the tetrad’s formal scaffolding from classical to quantum logic allows brief reversible quantum-tunneled ascents by subjectivity from the circumferential gutter of vacua toward full TOE-like symmetry at the central peak of the sombrero-shaped potential. Probabilistically ambiguous attainment of the unknown TOE’s presumably unbroken symmetry through tunneling renders subjectivity’s relationship to physicality equivocal with regard to the causal closure of physics wrought by immunization of physical laws against intrusions by shifting qualia. Casimir-like effects and the Fourier duality of qualia are suggested as research targets for this experimentally falsifiable set of hypotheses.

Keywords:

broken symmetry, causal closure, Hard Problem, inconsistent tetrad, sombrero potential, tunneling

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Donald Mender, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

Dr. Mender is a lecturer and former assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Yale University.  He founded the QPP initiative and is the author of a book and numerous technical papers. He has also published letters in the New York Times as well as poetry in literary journals.  

References

Abbott E. Flatland: A Romance in Many Dimensions. New York: Dover; 1992.

Albert D. Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1992.

Audi R, ed. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

Baggott J. The Quantum Story: A History in 40 Moments. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

Barrett W. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. New York: Anchor Books; 1958.

Barrow J. The Book of Nothing: Vacuums, Voids, and the Latest Ideas About the Origins of the Universe. New York: Vintage; 2000.

Campbell K. Body and Mind. New York: Anchor Books; 1984.

Chalmers D. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud. 1995;2(3):3.

Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.

Coughlin GD, Dodd JE. The Ideas of Particle Physics: An Introduction for Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

Davidson D. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1970.

Gibbs J. Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics: Developed with Especial Reference to the Rational Foundation of Thermodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

Globus G. Quantum Closures and Disclosures. Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 2003.

Haramein N, Baker A. Resolving the vacuum catastrophe: a holographic approach. J High Energy Phys Gravitation Cosmology. 2019;5:212-424.

Heidegger M. Being and Time. New York: HarperCollins; 2008.

Heidegger M. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Kisiel T, trans. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1985.

Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2007.

Icke V. The Force of Symmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

Jackson F. Epiphenomenal qualia. Philos Q. 1982;32:127-136.

James W. The Principles of Psychology. London: Macmillan; 1890.

Jibu M, Yasue K. Quantum Brain Dynamics and Consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1994.

Kant I. Critique of Practical Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.

Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

Kearney R. Modern Movements in Continental Philosophy: Phenomenology, Critical Theory, Structuralism. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1994.

Kripke S. Quantified modality and essentialism. Noûs. 2017;51(2):221-234.

Lapore E, Loewer B. Mind matters. J Philos. 1987;84(11):630.

Leibniz G. The Monadology: A New Translation and Guide. Strickland L, trans. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2014.

Levine J. On leaving out what it’s like. In: Davies M, Humphreys G, eds. Consciousness: Phenomenological and Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Blackwell; 1983.

Locke J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Phemister P, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

Margenau H. The Nature of Physical Reality: A Philosophy of Modern Physics. Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press; 1977.

Mender D. Antishielding the explanatory gap. Quantum Biosystems. 2020;11(3):44-48.

Mender D. Review of Biophysics of Consciousness: A Foundational Approach. J Conscious Stud. 2016;24(7-8):238-246.

Mender D. The implicit possibility of dualism in quantum probabilistic cognitive modeling. Behav Brain Sci. 2013;36(3):298-299.

Mill J. Utilitarianism. Crisp R, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.

Moran D. Introduction to Phenomenology. New York: Routledge; 2000.

Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev. 1974;83(4):4.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science: A Consensus Study Report. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2019.

Parker S, ed. The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993.

Penrose R. The Road to Reality. New York: Knopf; 2005.

Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Basic Books; 1962.

Pothos E, Busemeyer J. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Behav Brain Sci. 2013;36:255-327.

Priest S. Theories of the Mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1991.

Quine W, Ullian J. The Web of Belief. New York: Random House; 1978.

Reason C, Shah K. Conscious macrostates do not supervene on physical microstates. J Conscious Stud. 2021;28(5-6):102-120.

Reber A, Alcock J. Searching for the impossible: parapsychology’s elusive quest. Am Psychol. 2020;75(3):391-399.

Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002.

Sartre J. Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology. Richmond S, trans. New York: Washington Square Press; 2018.

Searle J. Is the brain’s mind a computer program? Sci Am. 1990;262(1):25-31.

Searle J. Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books; 1998.

Shannon C. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27:379-423, 623-656.

Smith H. The Religions of Man. New York: Mentor; 1958.

Steiner G, Barry R. The mechanism of dishabituation. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014;8:14.

Susskind L, Friedman A. Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum. New York: Basic Books; 2014.

Tsuchiya N, Bruza P, Yamada M, Saigo H, Pothos E. Quantum-like qualia hypothesis: from quantum cognition to quantum perception. Front Psychol. 2025;15:1406459..doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405459

Turton R. The Quantum Dot: A Journey into the Future of Microelectronics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.

Umezawa H. Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro, and Thermal. Woodbury: AIP Press; 1993.

Vicente A. On the causal closedness of physics. Int Stud Philos Sci. 2006;20(2):149-171.

Vitiello G. My Double Unveiled: The Dissipative Quantum Model of Brain. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2001.

Von Baeyer H. QBism: The Future of Quantum Physics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2016.

Westphal J. The Mind-Body Problem. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2016.

Wilson K. Problems in physics with many scales of length. Sci Am. 1979;241(2):158-179.

Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1958.

Wrightman A. Group theory. In: Parker S, ed. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993:515-518.

Zee A. On Gravity: A Brief Tour of a Weighty Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2018.

Downloads

Published

17.04.2025

How to Cite

Mender, D. (2025). Metaphysical Tunneling: Probabilities of Transient Escape from the Hard Problem. Journal of NeuroPhilosophy, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15233756