Freedom under Naturalistic Dualism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14272517Abstract
This article explores the issue of freedom in the framework of naturalistic dualism. Given that for physicalism the Universe is no more than the execution of the mechanical (either deterministic or stochastic) laws of Physics, reality is chance and necessity. On the other hand, consciousness is immediately real. By evaluating the set of possible futures conditional on their own actions a subject builds a legitimate mental object that is the scope of their "freedom". The existence of free will depends on the fact that the future cannot be remembered. The philosophical relevance of a better scientific understanding of time asymmetry is underscored and it is conjectured that it is related to the existence of fundamental (ontic) randomness in the fundamental Laws of Physics. The article closes with a short discussion on the moral consequences of this vision: the abhorrence that evil deeds produce is justified in absence of causative agency because they signal an unworthy conscious perpetrator.
Keywords:
free will, naturalistic dualism, time asymmetryDownloads
Metrics
References
Acacio de Barros J, Oas G. Can we falsify the consciousness-causes-collapse hypothesis in quantum mechanics? Foundations of Physics 2017; 47(10): 1294–1308.
Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press; 1996.
Epstein JM. Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press; 2006.
Gertler B. Dualism: How Epistemic Issues Drive Debates About the Ontology of Consciousness. In: The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness. Oxford University Press; 2020.
Hemmo M, Shenker O. The Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Psychological Arrow of Time. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2022.
Koch C, Massimini M, Boly M, Tononi G. Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2016.
Marshall W, Albantakis L, Mayner W, Koch C, Tononi G. Dissociating Intelligence from Consciousness in Artificial Systems - Implications of Integrated Information Theory. Proceedings of the 2019 Towards Conscious AI Systems Symposium, AAAI SSS19; 2019.
Massimini M, Tononi G. Sizing Up Consciousness: Towards an Objective Measure of the Capacity for Experience. Oxford University Press; 2013.
Maudlin T. Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory. Princeton University Press; 2019.
Minsky M. The Society of Mind. Pocket Books; 1988.
Nath Bera M, Acín A, Kuś M, Mitchell MW, Lewenstein M. Randomness in Quantum Mechanics: philosophy, physics and technology. Reports on Progress in Physics 2017.
Steward H. The Metaphysical Presuppositions of Moral Responsibility. The Journal of Ethics 2012.
Schopenhauer A. Essays on Freedom of the Will. Wiley-Blackwell; 1969.
Timpe K. Leeway vs. Sourcehood Conceptions of Free Will. In: The Routledge Companion to Free Will; 2016.
O’Connor T, Franklin C. Free Will. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; 2022.
Yu S, Nikolić D. Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness. Annalen der Physik 2011; 523(11).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arturo Macías
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors continue to hold copyright with no restrictions.